- EVs are much less prone to rear-end different vehicles due to improved frontal collision avoidance tech
- They’re, nonetheless, extra prone to be rear-ended
- EVs nonetheless take extra time and are dearer to restore versus gas-powered vehicles
It seems that driving an EV might make you much less of a street hazard—at the least from behind. A new research reveals that EVs are racking up fewer and fewer front-end collisions in comparison with their gas-powered counterparts. The information reveals that ICE vehicles are, on common, 6% extra prone to be concerned in a repairable front-end collision than EVs (32% vs 26%, respectively). So what is the secret, precisely? Effectively, it is all that fancy new driver-assistance tech!
Let’s dive into why EVs are successful this battle. The key purpose is simply how new EVs are to market; fresh-off-the-line EVs on the street have a more recent common mannequin yr in comparison with most gas-powered fashions. This implies newer and extra refreshed tech planted in EVs—lane-keeping, front-crash avoidance methods, and computerized emergency braking—are all doing their job fairly effectively and padding the stats within the EVs’ favor.
Picture by: Tesla
Apparently, whereas repairable EVs are much less prone to hit a car from the entrance, they’re extra prone to be plowed into from the rear. The research reveals that 36% of BEV repairs are for rear-end impacts versus 28% of ICE automobiles. This appears like such a bizarre statistic, would not it? However stick with me right here, as a result of there may be a straightforward clarification as to why.
The research hypothesizes that regenerative braking could possibly be accountable. Particularly, it calls out the distinction in driving dynamics when driving an EV in single-pedal mode versus utilizing friction braking to decelerate an ICE-powered automotive. Regardless of EVs gaining popularity, they nonetheless solely make up round 8% of recent car gross sales, so drivers—you realize, those tailgating you whereas weaving out and in of visitors—won’t be prepared for an EV’s regenerative braking to do its factor when the driving force lifts off the fuel pedal abruptly.
Let’s discuss turkey whereas we’re right here. Entrance-end collisions are considerably dearer to repair than being hit within the rear. The research estimates that restore prices are, on common, round 40% larger for front-end crashes, making EVs an surprising ally on this division. The flip aspect is that they are nonetheless dearer within the store and take longer to restore.
This could possibly be as a result of overwhelmingly excessive use of OEM components to finish restores. The research goes on to level out that 90.3% of components utilized in BEV repairs are OEM components immediately from the producer. ICE automobiles use round 64.4%, which helps to chop down on prices. And to rub salt within the wound, fewer components may be repaired as an alternative of changed in EVs (12.4% vs 13.9%, respectively).
These stats do not imply that EVs are getting totaled at the next price than ICE. In reality, the entire loss frequency is almost the identical, differing by lower than one-tenth of a %. Nevertheless, the common complete lack of an EV is larger at $32,718 for BEVs in Q3 versus $31,070 for mannequin yr 2021 and newer ICE vehicles.
It is solely a matter of time earlier than refreshed fuel vehicles get outfitted with comparable tech that helps keep away from these embarrassing “whoops” moments behind the wheel. For now, you may at the least really feel a bit bit safer pulling as much as a purple mild when an EV is behind you—simply hope that the EV driver would not have a rushing ICE automotive arising behind it.
